Report: Paramount considering 'Paranormal Activity' sequel
Can lightening strike twice or would it be another 'Blair Witch 2'?
After the amazing box office run for "Paranormal Activity" a movie studio would be negligent to moviegoers and its shareholders if it didn't consider a sequel. Therefore, it's no surprise that Paramount Pictures is looking at all its options as they celebrate their profitable bonanza. Speaking to The Los Angeles Times today, studio Chairman Brad Grey is leaving the door open for a second installment of the online and word-of-mouth phenomenon.
Grey is quoted as saying, "We have the rights on a worldwide basis to do 'Paranormal 2' and we're looking to see if that makes some sense."
"Paranormal Activity" has already made $62.5 million in the U.S. after it was acquired for only a paltry $300,000. The studio does not hold worldwide rights to the original, but has that option on the sequel.
In 2000, now defunct Artisan Entertainment rushed a sequel to the 1999 blockbuster "The Blair Witch Project" into theaters only a year after the original made a stunning $140 million domestic. Titled "The Blair Witch Project: Book of Shadows," the picture featured a whole new cast and creative team. It was a complete critical and box office misfire only grossing $26.4 million.
If Paramount does move forward, it would be smart to avoid the mistakes Artisan made by bringing back writer and director Oren Peli as well as any of the surviving cast members. Peli is already at work on an independently produced Sci-Fi flick "Area 51," but considering the careers of the "Blair Witch" filmmakers (they don't really have one), he should also take a sequel offer to "Paranormal" very seriously.
Do you want to see a sequel to "Paranormal Activity"? Share your thoughts below.
News From Our Partners
-
'Star Trek Into Darkness' Takes Box-Office Crown With $84 Million
'Arrested Development' Gang: Where Are They Now?
'Star Trek Into Darkness': What's Next For J.J. Abrams And The Cast?
-
'Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters': Jeremy Renner Never Read the Script Before Signing On
'Angry Birds' Movie Flies Forward
Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique: First Look at the Actress in 'X-Men: Days of Future Past'
-
Crosstalk: How does Chris Brown get away with it?
For Our Consideration: What do we mean when we call music pretentious?
Interview: Michael Cera on the evolution of George Michael Bluth and working in Arrested Development’s writers’ room
-
What to Watch Tonight: SYTYCD, Awkward., and the Finales of Grimm, The Game, and DWTS
What to Watch Tonight: The Season Finales of Rectify and Hawaii Five-0 and the Series Premieres of The Goodwin Games and Motive
Mad Men "The Crash" Review: Uppers Give You Wings!
-
'The Voice' Live Round Recap: The Top 10 Perform
Beyonce Is a 'Grown Woman' in Leaked Track
Ultra Music Festival Dates Announced, Tickets Go on Sale May 21
-
Ranking the Blockbusters with Summer Movie Scorecard 2013
RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: The Last Stand and Side Effects
Box Office Guru Wrapup: Star Trek Softer Than Expected at #1
-
'Bates Motel' Season 2: Will Norman Go Full 'Psycho?'
FX's 'The Strain' Taps 'Alias' Star Mia Maestro as Female Lead
FX's 'Tyrant': Ang Lee Drops out of Directing the Pilot, Cites 'Life of Pi' Exhaustion
-
Heather Wagner: 'Hot In Orange County'
John Barrowman's Surprising New Role
WATCH: How A Frog Transformed Kerry Washington's Thinking

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupJordo
October 25, 2009 at 10:45PM EST Reply to CommentThey could make a sequel set in the '60s, but a sequel would only work if the same people were involved and the budget remained the same.