Cannes Film Festival 2013

'Hunger Games' producer on 'Twilight' comparisons: 'It doesn't make a lot of sense to me'

Nina Jacobson says the two YA series are 'very different animals'

<p>But who would win in a cage  match?</p>

But who would win in a cage  match?

Credit: Summit Entertainment (Stewart); Lionsgate (Lawrence)

Are you a fan of Hunger Games?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

"The Hunger Games" producer Nina Jacobson isn't all that keen on those "Twilight" comparisons.

"Honestly, I’ve always thought of them as very different animals," answered Jacobson when prompted about the comparisons at a recent "Hunger Games" roundtable discussion. "I think that they have actually very different fan bases and they are very different books.  And so, honestly, I’ve never really understood the comparison and...it doesn't make a lot of sense to me, honestly, because I think they’re quite distinctive books. Very, very different."

Regardless, the inevitable "Twilight" comparisons have cropped up in the media ever since the film first embarked on its journey to the big screen - comparisons that unfortunately don't do justice to the fact of how very different the two young-adult properties are.

While both are targeted at a 'tween/teen demographic, the "Twilight" series is, at its core, a slice of romantic escapism (and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that). "The Hunger Games", by comparison, actually has a great deal to say about the way we live now, and possibly where we're headed.

"I think ['The Hunger Games' is] actually a very contemporary book," said Jacobson later. "And I think it speaks to the divisions between the 99 percent and the 1 percent, and I think it speaks to young people and their anxieties about the future that awaits them.  And I think it’s a book that is very relevant to the times that we live in, a time where sort of celebrity and the gloss of reality TV and of the quest for fame overshadows larger social ills that people also need and want to talk about.  And I think the fact that the book marries those things makes it very relevant."

Jacobson spoke about the project with such passion and conviction throughout that I had no doubt she meant every word of it. And not just passion and conviction for the potential (read: likely) financial rewards to be reaped from the property, but also a belief that the story was a valuable one, worth telling.

"I couldn't put it down.  I couldn't stop thinking about it.  I couldn't bear the thought of not being a producer of it.  I couldn't bear the thought that somebody else would produce it," she told us at one point during the interview. "I felt very protective of the book.  I felt like this was a great book.  It could be very easily adapted in the wrong way.  And I wanted to have the chance to be its champion, and I was able to convince Suzanne of that."

All other considerations aside, one thing the "Hunger Games" and "Twilight" franchises do have in common (or at least will very soon) is that they're both massively-lucrative pieces of business for anyone lucky enough to be involved.

Do you think there's any relevance to the comparisons between "Twilight" and "The Hunger Games" outside of their young-adult origins? Sound off in the comments!

You can follow me on Twitter @HitFixChris

Chris-eggertsen-sm
A former contributor to sites including Bloody-Disgusting and AfterElton, Eggertsen enjoys rock music, rainy days and smelling the pages of old books. You should read all of his articles and follow him on Twitter because it's the right thing to do.
Trending Now on HitFix Boards
Topic Started By Latest Post Replies
sandylewis90
10 days ago
2
sandylewis90
29 days ago
1
Discuss In Theaters and Coming Soon on HitFix Message Boards »

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Shari

    WAY different fan base, extremely different story lines. NO comparison and it's very annoying the press continues to mention them together.

    March 13, 2012 at 3:51AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    HiLo

    The leading actresses are like day and night. Stewart horrificly bad and the character itself is awful too. Jennifer Lawrence on the other hand is a great actress. Let's hope they don't try to market the next films with a showmance between Jennifer and one of the actors like it's done with Twilight. But HG has a good story and no need for that.

    March 13, 2012 at 8:15AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      kris Haha I see right through your bashing of Kristen kinda sad actually

      March 13, 2012 at 9:06AM EST
  • Caricatureandrew4_talkback_profile

    Biddle

    It's like comparing Sarah Palin and Hilary Clinton. One is vapid is showy on the surface while the other is smart and complex.

    March 13, 2012 at 9:15AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Caricatureandrew4_talkback_profile

      Biddle lol I'm talking about smart and complex and my typo makes me sound like a goober. "One is vapid is showy"? ugh... One is vapid AND showy.

      March 13, 2012 at 9:17AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DefRef While Hillary is certainly vapid, no one with eyes would call her "showy."

      In an honest analysis, Palin is like Katniss and Hillary is Bella:

      * Palin - Self-made business woman who cared for her family, hunts, and toppled a corrupt government good-old-boy network. Declared an enemy by the elites.

      * Hillary - Rode coat-tails of philandering husband, parleying pity and entitlement into elected office and then a Cabinet post she's shown little aptitude for.

      Bella is a terrible role model for girls because she teaches passivity and waiting for the boys to make something over her. Katniss is bold and take charge. No one should want their daughters to grow up to be a doormat like Hillary, but rather a strong grizzly mama like Palin.

      March 13, 2012 at 10:13AM EST
    • Caricatureandrew4_talkback_profile

      Biddle I should have known better then to make a political comparison, especially a topic as polarizing as Sarah Palin. Though she is in my mind after watching the terrific "Game Change"

      Fref, I have no interest in derailing this thread into a debate about Palin versus Clinton. I will however clarify that I was comparing Sarah Palin to the shiney on the surface (dare I say sparkly) yet ultimately void of deep thought Twilight series.

      So I think we can agree that you support Palin and I spoort Clinton and move on happily with our lives. :D However we both seem to be fans of Hunger Games which is all that matters within the confines of this particular conversation.

      March 13, 2012 at 10:59AM EST
    • Caricatureandrew4_talkback_profile

      Biddle "I spoort Clinton" that sounds dirty.

      March 13, 2012 at 11:00AM EST
    • Stewie_vader_avatar_talkback_profile

      mcspinelli All political things aside, DefRef makes a good point in his/her comparison of the fictional characters and real-life characters.

      March 13, 2012 at 2:14PM EST
  • Gamera1_talkback_profile

    KlarkKent

    Are they anything alike? Lord, I hope not. While I have not read the books, I have my heart set on them perhaps being the alternative that will get girls' attention off that mind pollution. Someday the Harry Potter movies will be looked back at fondly. Perhaps these will too. And the Twilight movies will be an embarrassing chapter that people avoid admitting they were obsessed with.

    March 13, 2012 at 9:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Stewie_vader_avatar_talkback_profile

    mcspinelli

    Anyone making these comparisons are morons.

    These 2 stories are not even close. Twilight was created for little tween girls to scream about how sexy the actors are. I was forced to see the first one. The story was horrible and Stewart/Patinson gave terrible performances. One of the worst movies ever with crappy characters to boot.

    The Hunger Games is the complete opposite. It has a solid story throughout the 3 books and enough brutal violence to keep men interested (and I'm not a huge reader, so it's a huge compliment). The book centers around a girl, but the Katniss character isn't a girlie-girl. She hunts and isn't the typical female stereotype (which will go a long way with male viewers). Also, Jennifer Lawrence is 10x the actress Kristen Stewart is (and much hotter). I have no doubts she'll nail this role and this movie will become one of the most successful franchises of all time.

    March 13, 2012 at 2:09PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Mastershake_talkback_profile

    War Chief Shake Zula

    I know one common point - they're both inspiring hype backlash on my part.

    March 13, 2012 at 10:44PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web