Cannes Film Festival 2013

She Said/Studio Said: The Rachelle Lefevre 'Eclipse' controversy continues

Summit responds to Lefevre stunned comments on being replaced by Bryce Dallas Howard

The drama over Rachelle Lefevre's dismissal from 'The Twilight Saga" franchise hasn't quieted down.

Credit: AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Nathan Denette

 

This is getting very ugly.

Initially, yesterday's surprising news of Rachelle Lefevre being replaced by Bryce Dallas Howard in the key role of Victoria in "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" seemed like it would fade away as both sides tried to put the best light on the situation.  That's hardly been the case.  Lefevre responded earlier today saying she was 'stunned' by the news and had been 'fully committed' to the role having turned down several other film opportunities to complete her character's three picture arc.  While many studios would have just stayed quiet hoping to quell the controversy, Summit went on the defensive Wednesday evening issuing the following statement:

"We at Summit Entertainment are disappointed by Rachelle Lefevre’s recent comments which attempt to make her career choices the fault of the Studio. Her decision to discuss her version of the scheduling challenges publicly has forced the Studio to set the record straight and correct the facts.

* Ms. Lefevre's representatives were advised as early as April that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE was expected to start shooting in early August.

* If Ms. Lefevre was, as she describes “passionate,” about being part of THE TWILIGHT SAGA, we feel that she and her representatives would have included us in her decision to work on another film that would conflict with the shooting schedule of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.

* It was not until July 20th that Summit was first informed of Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to BARNEY’S VERSION, a commitment we have since been advised she accepted in early June. Summit had acted in good faith that she would be available to fulfill her obligations both in terms of rehearsals and shooting availability for THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE. We feel that her choice to withhold her scheduling conflict information from us can be viewed as a lack of cooperative spirit which affected the entire production.

* Furthermore Ms. Lefevre took a role in the other film that places her in Europe during the required rehearsal time, and at least ten days of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE’s principal photography. This period is essential for both rehearsal time with the cast, and for filming at key locations that are only available during the initial part of production.

* Contrary to Ms. Lefevre’s statement, it is simply untrue that the Studio dismissed her over a ten day overlap. It is not about a ten day overlap, but instead about the fact that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE is an ensemble production that has to accommodate the schedules of numerous actors while respecting the established creative vision of the filmmaker and most importantly the story.

The fact remains that Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to the other project - which she chose to withhold from Summit until the last possible moment - makes her unfortunately unavailable to perform the role of Victoria in THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE."

[Statement initially posted on MSN Movies Twilight Fan Blog]

If you read between the lines, there is way more to this story than what both parties are revealing here.  Lefevre's management may be at fault for misrepresenting their client and mistakingly playing hardball, but couldn't the studio really have handled this more smoothly?  If Lefevre was truly blindsided by this news -- and you have to take her at her word she was -- why did Summit not try to broach her personally about the conflict?  From all accounts, Lefevre has been a willing and drama-less ambassador for the franchise making almost any appearance or publicity request asked of her.  What makes this whole situation even more peculiar is Summit expertly maneuvered around the touchy issue of "Twilight" director Catherine Hardwicke not returning to helm "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" when she'd publicly stated her desire to on numerous occasions.  In fact, Hardwicke went on to help publicize the film's DVD release after Chris Weitz was brought on to direct "New Moon" (although she did have a financial incentive for the DVD to do well).

On the sideline is Howard, who no doubt is wondering, 'What have I gotten into?' and whether she'll be answering questions on the casting change for the next 12 months (yep).  It's hard to imagine she thought the blowback would be this bad when she was agreed to come on aboard over the past few days.

Sadly, the biggest losers here are the fans who are getting caught in a tug of war between a rising star whose was extremely fan-friendly and a studio who has done everything possible to satisfy their constant hunger for new material.  Is it going to take franchise author Stephenie Meyer to broker peace between everyone involved?  One thing is clear, if you end up seeing Lefevre on Larry King Live or hearing her on Ryan Seacrest's radio show over the next few days?  Then it's really gotten ugly.

Look for more updates on this story as it develops on HitFix.

Greg-ellwood-sm
Gregory Ellwood
Editor-in-Chief, Co-Founder
With over a decade of experience in the movie industry, Ellwood survived working for two major studios and has written for Variety, MSN and the LA Times. A co-founder of HitFix, Ellwood spends his time relaxing hitting 3’s on the basketball court and following his beloved Clippers.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    half_my_self

    They like this

    July 30, 2009 at 3:13AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Twilight Lurve

    Summit has handled the situation very poorly. Twilight fans are siding with Rachelle and the studio's reputation is in deep garbage.
    I can't wait to see how the rest of the cast reacts and how much deeper of a hole Summit will dig for themselves.

    July 30, 2009 at 3:43AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Diana

    I agree. Did they really give her any choice? Was there even room for negotiations? or they just jumped at the first opportunity at a loophole and went on with the recast anyway. making that announcement immediately leaving her no choice at all.I don't know but with the obvious controlling last comic con for something as small thing as the leads' seating arrangement last comic con, i'm likely to side with rachelle on this. i don't trust summit. smells like a lot of shenanigans to me.

    July 30, 2009 at 6:56AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    phillygirl19119

    I love Rachelle. I read her statement and I read Summit’s rebuttal. I think Summit’s rebuttal was slightly harsh for the situation but since there has not been any further statement from Rachelle’s people correcting their statement or providing further insight, I have to look at what is logical. From my perspective, Summit’s statement appears to be logical. I think Rachelle took it for granted that Slade would make an adjustment just because it was only 10 days. And he either couldn’t or wouldn’t. When you go by the name of Nichole Kidman, Jody Foster, Julia Roberts etc…you might just get 10 days. Rachelle LaFevre doesn’t.Trust me I was shocked and outraged early today like the rest of you, but no one has seen a contract so we don’t know. But just going by each statement, what Summit has said seems logical and has not been rebutted. Rachelle hasn’t called them outright liars and stated what’s not true with what they said. She and her people rolled the dice and they crapped out. Such is life. She, like Solomon and Catherine would be missed but life goes on. No one likes the wolf pack now because Solomon is no longer Sam? I don’t think so. Has anyone seen the latest wolf pack poster? I liked Solomon but I’m sorry, I love the wolf pack as it is today. Bryce (go see her You Tube video interview when she was on the David Letterman show) is such a sweet person just like her daddy Ron. She’s funny and just down right nice. I really think we all should step back and give her a chance. Let’s all calm down. Rachelle is not returning no matter how many calls are made and petitions are signed (yes I signed it because my heart gave in). She just blew it. She wanted her cake and eat it too and it just didn’t pan out. Here’s my question to all Twilighters and think really hard: “If Rachelle has this love for Twilight like she said she does, then why didn’t she quit the other movie so she could be in Vancouver for rehearsal”? She could have told the other producers that she couldn’t be in the Dustin Hoffman film because she had to do Eclipse. See…this is what Summit was saying (kind of harshly but you understand their point). She should have quit the other film because of the scheduling conflict. She had to be in Vancouver to rehearse with the cast. She is a major character and focal point in the film. You bring your behind to Canada. By the way, go and read the article dated July 11, 2009 written by Twilight Examiner where she called it then that Rachelle may not be in Eclipse due to a scheduling conflict. That was on the 11th folks. I’m sorry, Rachelle knew it like Summit stated. She blew it. I love her dearly and will miss her. But she just blew it. Summit called her bluff and she lost. It’s sad, but we have to move on. Because the bottom-line is…WE ARE GOING TO GO TO SEE ECLIPSE NO MATTER WHAT. The proposal, the sleeping bag scene as Taylor so fondly intimated during the panel, the huge fight, the visit of the Volturi, Jacob stealing a kiss and Bella kissing him back! Come on people, you are going to see Eclipse no matter who plays Victoria. So let’s all calm down, take a deep breath, shed some tears for Rachelle and move on.

    July 30, 2009 at 9:07AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Arikka

    I love Rachelle and i am so outraged by this! I even created a blog to Support Rachelle

    http://norachellemajorfail.blogspot.com/

    July 30, 2009 at 10:06AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tina

    No matter what you say summit you all suck and you are the worst to work for. Rachel deserves better you guys could have discussed it before replacing her.

    July 30, 2009 at 10:07AM EST Reply to Comment


  • We speak our mind via a letter to Summit here:
    http://letterstotwilight.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/rachelle-lefevre-out-as-victoria-and-we-want-to-know-why/

    July 30, 2009 at 10:25AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Alison

    I think Summit will regret it. They are kicking a vital actor out of the movie and changing characters will screw with everyone's minds - it WILL disrupt the story far more than LeFever's schedule ever could.

    July 31, 2009 at 3:08AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ally

    WE LOVE RACHELLE IN THE CARACTER......IS REALLY BAD FOR THE STORY....THE FANS SUPPORT RACHELLE.....

    August 1, 2009 at 2:48PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Rachel

    She is perfect for the role. Replacing Rachelle is like replacing Rob or Kristen. She is soooo important to Eclipse. They will regret the decision. I have heard many people say they won't even go see Eclipse now. I agree. Way to go Summit! Ruined a great film! They could have saved all this from happening by shooting her parts at a different time. Come on!!! Aren't movies suppose to be all about the fans when it comes to this kind of thing! Without the fans it will go no where!!! I would be interested to hear about what Stephenie Meyer thinks about this!

    September 1, 2009 at 4:49PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Misty

    I think it is a big mistake to replace her! With the Twilight Saga movies being SUCH A BIG HIT, it is ridiculous to replace ANY of the cast unless it is absolutely necessary! The fans KNOW these actors/actresses as the characters now and deserve to see them finish out the saga if at all possible! She was PERFECT as Victoria!!!

    November 24, 2009 at 12:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    tracey Burns

    They we're so wrong to replace Rachel playing Victoria, as an avid fan of the books it has made me want to stop watching the films. BTW New Moon did it's best but never got near to the essence of the book.

    November 29, 2009 at 4:46PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      tracey Burns Rachel you were great as Victoria, what more can I say

      November 29, 2009 at 4:49PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    miky@funny girl

    I love Rachelle ,she is perfect for this part.they cant replace her!!! the new,is never going to replace old and one and only Victoria-Rachelle Lefevre.

    January 2, 2010 at 11:36AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    purplemist

    I think even it's so unfair to treat this issues this way, summit is being unfair to its cast, why do kristen and rob get to do short films or advertisements all over the world and summit doesn't say anything about it, I mean, they're more fully booked than rachelle isn't it? Do they want their actors to forget everything else and drop everything for the twilight saga? sorry but that is just pathetic for summit. how capitalistic of you.

    November 9, 2010 at 3:07AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web