'Hancock' sequel moving forward
Sony Pictures hires screenwriters, but will anyone care?
Will Smith as "Hancock." Ready for more?
It's hard to dismiss a blockbuster that raked in over $624 million worldwide, but Will Smith's "Hancock" never seemed like the kick off to a new franchise. Like a number of summer "hits" before it such as "Tomb Raider," "Van Helsing," "Superman Returns" and Tim Burton's "Planet of the Apes," the box office delivered, but audiences expectations weren't. It could have been the odd tone or dramatic turn of events in the film's third act, but the first "Hancock" never felt like a world moviegoers would want to return to. Always hungry for franchises, Sony Pictures would respectfully disagree. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the studio has hired Adam Fierro and Glen Mazzara to write the sequel.
The storyline for "Hancock 2" is being kept secret for now, but the screenwriters are actively working with Smith and director Peter Berg at expanding the universe from the first film.
The original film eventually revealed the title character was one of many immortal beings who had lived on earth for over 3,000 years, but loose their powers when they come in proximity of other immortals. Charlize Theron played a fellow immortal and love interest for Hancock in the picture. The first installment also ended with Hancock seemingly moving his base of operations from Los Angeles to New York. It's unclear where the new film will take place or if Theron will return.
Fierro has a long resume of work on TV shows such as "24," "The Shield" and "Dexter." Mazzara was a showrunner on the critically lambasted TV version of "Crash" and worked with Fierro on "The Shield."
The studio is hoping to put "Hancock 2" on a fast track, but how quickly it will make it into theaters is still unknown.
Do you want to see a "Hancock" sequel? Share your thoughts below.
News From Our Partners
-
Kristen Stewart's 'On The Road': Cannes Reviews Are In!
Charlize Theron Prefers 'Angular Nudity' To Full-Frontal
Will Smith Laughs Off Kissing-Reporter Incident
-
Tolerability Index: This week we're barely putting up with Veep and Girls
Interview: Milk’s Oscar-winning writer Dustin Lance Black on directing Jennifer Connelly and kinky Mormons
My World Of Flops: Bonfire Of The Vanity Projects Case File #16: Give My Regards To Broad Street and Magical Mystery Tour
-
'The Walking Dead': See Danai Gurira as Michonne
'Pretty Little Liars' Season 3x02 'Blood Is the New Black': New 'A' means business
TV ratings: 'Glee' and 'Dancing With the Stars' finales down from last year
-
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The Telefile - TV on DVD: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
The Telefile - The Cancelled 2011-12 TV Shows We'll Miss the Least
-
Cannes 2012: Critics Scorecard
24 Frames: The Films of Wes Anderson
Trailer: Leonardo DiCaprio in Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby
-
'Anchorman 2': Why Will Ferrell Made The Announcement On 'Conan'
Kristen Stewart's 'Snow White' Message To Girls: 'Don't Be A Vain Idiot'
Kristen Stewart 'On The Road' Sex Scenes: Topless More Than Taylor Lautner
-
Selena Gomez Is All Grown Up in Sexy 'Forbes' Photoshoot (PHOTOS)
PHOTOS: 'Before They Were Famous' Soap Opera Hair
Michelle Obama To Appear On 'The Daily Show' With Jon Stewart
HitFix Poll
Do you want to see a sequel to "Hancock"?
Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupShaun
August 25, 2009 at 2:16AM EST Reply to CommentNo. The first movie was ok, but there was no sense of it needing a sequel. Leave it ALONE!
TallBoy66
August 25, 2009 at 9:29PM EST Reply to CommentI don't particularly see the need for a sequel, but I do agree that the first movie is totally underrated. Yes, it took a dramatic turn but it was unexpected, that's the point. They need a way better villain. Hook hand guy was lame.