Cannes Film Festival 2013

Box Office: 'The Avengers' staggering $200.3 million sets all-time opening record

History hits the multiplex


Are you a fan of The Avengers?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

"Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Pt. 2" had a fine run at the top of the all-time box office chart, but it's inevitably come to an end.  Joss Whedon's "The Avengers" broke the record with a staggering $200.3 million debut this past weekend. That figure crushes "Harry Potter's" three-day cume of $169.1 million achieved just last July. Comparatively, "The Hunger Games" debuted with $152 million in March which, at the time, was the third largest opening in history.

Obviously, "The Avengers" should be a major force for at least the next two months at the multiplex.  The Marvel Studios release that finally brought heroes Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, the Hulk, Black Widow and Hawkeye together on the big screen scored a rare A+ Cinemascore rating from moviegoers. The film also scored a 69 on Metacritic from major critics and a 93% on Rotten Tomatoes. It's biggest challenge this year will come from "The Dark Knight Rises."  The third installment in Nolan's Batman franchise follows 2008's "The Dark Knight" which at one time held the all-time opening record with $152.5 million (with no inflated 3D prices) until "Harry Potter" topped it last summer. Still, for Marvel Studios and the Walt Disney Company this is a day to celebrate. Even with rising ticket prices it wasn't that long ago that no one thought a $200 million opening was even possible.

Want More...

The Avengers?
  • Avengers640_thumbnail
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.
Dropping to second place was "Think Like A Man" with another $8 million and a superb $73 million so far. The Screen Gems comedy has an excellent chance of crossing the $100 million mark before the month's end.

The aforementioned "Hunger Games" stakes out the third slot with another $5.7 million in its 7th weekend. The Gary Ross blockbuster is now up to $380 million and is perilously close to hitting $400 million domestic.

Fourth place went to the "The Lucky One."  Zac Efron's romantic drama grossed another $5.5 million for $47.9 million so far. "Lucky One" will become the fifth creation of author Nicholas Sparks to cross the $50 million mark. And, more telling, every single one of his films has made over $40 million domestic. Considering how relatively inexpensive his dramas are, that's an excellent track record.

Fifth went to "The Pirates: A Band of Misfits." The Sony Animation and Aardman Animation collaboration found $5.4 million for a disappointing $18.5 million to date.

Next weekend's new releases include Tim Burton's adaptation of the cult 60's TV series "Dark Shadows."

Box office actuals are released on Monday.

For interviews with the cast of "The Avengers," photos and more, click here.

Greg-ellwood-sm
Gregory Ellwood
Editor-in-Chief, Co-Founder
With over a decade of experience in the movie industry, Ellwood survived working for two major studios and has written for Variety, MSN and the LA Times. A co-founder of HitFix, Ellwood spends his time relaxing hitting 3’s on the basketball court and following his beloved Clippers.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Angie

    I guarantee this is because, unlike Harry Potter or Hunger Games fans, Avengers fans have already seen the movie multiple times. Why? My bf held a movie marathon of all hte referenced films Wednesday, saw it at midnight on Thursday night/Friday morning and was watching it again Friday evening.

    I guarantee you, he was not alone!

    HP and Hunger Games also have many child/teenage fans who can't sneak out of school or need their parents to take them, and don't have the luxury of skipping work, etc, that adult Avengers fans do.

    My guesses!

    May 6, 2012 at 1:11PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Arrested-development_talkback_profile

      kevincurtinred OK but Avengers has just as many child/teenage fans as Harry Potter or Hunger Games. Also you're saying that there wasn't a lot of fans who went to see those other movies multiple times as well? Come on...

      May 6, 2012 at 1:40PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Angie I didn't say HP and HG fans didn't go multiple times. I just said I guarantee Avengers fans, who skew older, have more access to do so! Especially in the first weekend, and especially b/c a lot of people who are Avengers fans are movie fans, not book fans.

      It's opinion, not a fact, and it's based on people that I actually know. Most HP or HG fans who went multiple times did so a few weeks later to accompany someone new. Most Avengers fans I know who ALREADY went multiple times did so to see new things and analyze the film.

      May 6, 2012 at 1:49PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Rich Knight Movie fans and not book fans? Even though The Avengers come from comic books and were around way longer than either Harry Potter or The Hunger Games? Or do you know consider comic books "books," even though it's right in their title of being comic "books".

      May 6, 2012 at 2:17PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Rich Knight I meant, "Not," not "Know."

      May 6, 2012 at 2:18PM EST
  • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

    Mulderism

    Let's not get too hyperbolic. We need to see what the drop off will be next week.

    I'm going to see it tonight. I've liked the Marvel Studios films that preceded it but I don't think those films are that great. For instance I liked X-Men First Class better than Thor or Captain America. There is just something about the Marvel Studio films that I don't get a lot out of repeat viewings like I do with the other studios films (e.g. Spider-Man, X-Men, Batman).

    May 6, 2012 at 1:59PM EST Reply to Comment
    • 661494-kuzco_large_talkback_profile

      Tedd Unless I'm forgetting one, I haven't really liked any of the non-Marvel studios Marvel films since 2004 (Spider-Man 2). X-Men: First Class was probably the best, and even that one I was only lukewarm on. Plus, there have been a ton of stinkers since then: X-Men 3, Wolverine, Spider-Man 3, both Fantastic 4 movies, both Ghost Rider movies, Elektra, the two Punisher movies...

      Although I didn't particularly like Captain America, Marvel Studio's batting average has been considerably higher than anyone else's over the last eight years.

      May 6, 2012 at 5:58PM EST
    • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

      Mulderism Agreed. There are some stinkers.

      As for non-Marvel heroes: I consider the Nolan Batman films in a league all their own.

      May 6, 2012 at 7:28PM EST
    • 661494-kuzco_large_talkback_profile

      Tedd Very true--Nolan takes such a radically different approach to the Batman movies that they feel like another genre entirely. Same with Watchmen and, for a slightly more comedic approach, Kick-Ass, both of which I quite liked.

      May 6, 2012 at 7:51PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Movie critic

    Hey why wasn't spiderman in the movie.??? He is a marvel character.. The movie was great without him but I think he should diffinitely be in the next one

    May 6, 2012 at 2:31PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      eBert Marvel doesn't own the rights to Spider-Man. They sold the rights to Sony to make Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy. Sony's reboot of Spider-Man only happened because if they hadn't made a Spider-Man film, the rights would go back to Marvel. The same thing goes for Fantastic Four and X-Men. Which is why X-Men First Class happened and a reboot of Fantastic Four is being planned..

      May 6, 2012 at 2:41PM EST
    • Zoidberg_talkback_profile

      mrbilliam Also, despite being a popular character, Spider-Man never used to be a member of the Avengers. It wasn't until a few years ago, that Marvel decided to add Spider-Man and Wolverine to one of the Avengers teams in their comics.

      May 6, 2012 at 3:31PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bob Those rights also go for Daredevil (which is being rebooted), Blade, and Ghost Rider. It would be nice if Marvel had all their characters back...Although, i think (if they're smart) other studios might see the potential of "lending" out their characters for Marvel team-ups.

      May 6, 2012 at 4:58PM EST
    • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

      Mulderism I can't speak yet for The Avengers (seeing it tonight) but based on how well Marvel Studios has done with Iron Man, Hulk, Thor and Captain America I would prefer that they DON'T muck around with the Spider-Man or X-Men franchises. I am happier with the movies Sony and Fox have released and I think they are better in overall quality than the Marvel Studio movies. Of course X-Men 3, Wolverine and Spider-Man 3 weren't that great but then I could say the same for Iron man 2 and The Incredible Hulk.

      May 6, 2012 at 5:37PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Prettok If they want to reboot the F4, it might not be a bad idea to set it in the 60s and cross it over with X-men. It would capitalize on the same common universe that is making the Avengers a success.

      May 6, 2012 at 11:28PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Bob

    I'll give you that Iron Man 2 was not good Mulderism, but I enjoyed The Incredible Hulk. I think you would at least agree with me in that Marvel Studios has gotten their characters "mostly" right as compared to (just a few others you forgot beside X3, Wolverine, and Spider-man 3)other studios handling of Fantastic Four 1&2, Daredevil, Blade 3, Punisher, Ghost Rider 1&2, and the jury is still out on whether Amazing Spider-man and Wolverine 2 will be any good...though I'm hoping for the best.

    My point is that, i think Marvel could do just a good a job, if not better than the other studios. Aside from keeping the rights, they don't "care" about the characters more than the house that built them.

    May 6, 2012 at 6:00PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

      Mulderism I can't quite put my finger on it but for some reason the Marvel films don't make me want to see them multiple times. The only exception is Iron Man 1. I recently rewatched Thor and Captain America on Netflix and I don't have any desire to see them again. The Incredible Hulk was one of my least favourite of theirs but I'm biased towards Ang Lee's Hulk which I loved (and am in a small minority).

      Spider-Man 1, Spider-Man 2, X-Men 1, X-Men 2, X-Men FC, Ang Lee's Hulk, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight: These are all movies that I saw in the theatre multiple times and then bought them on DVD to watch again.

      I don't quite understand it. The Marvel films are well done and have good casts but they just don't have a rewatchable quality to them that the others I listed have.

      Your mileage may vary.

      May 6, 2012 at 8:24PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    blue_flames

    LOLMG

    Please don't tell me that video was produced in-house ... "Supreme Headquarters International Espionage Law enforcement Division"?

    May 7, 2012 at 1:19AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Sonja And 'Barron' instead of 'Barton'. Repeatedly. Ouch.

      May 7, 2012 at 8:39AM EST

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

HitFix Poll

Which comic book Avengers member should join the team for Avengers 2?

Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web