Update Wed. July 29, 3:30 PM PST: In an exclusive statement to Access Hollywood, Rachel Lefevre says she's "stunned" by Summit's decision to re-cast the role.
She continued, “I was fully committed to the ‘Twilight’ saga, and to the portrayal of Victoria. I turned down several other film opportunities and, in accordance with my contractual rights, accepted only roles that would involve very short shooting schedules. My commitment to ‘Barney’s Version’ is only ten days. Summit picked up my option for ‘Eclipse.’ Although the production schedule for ‘Eclipse’ is over three months long, Summit said they had a conflict during those ten days and would not accommodate me. Given the length of filming for ‘Eclipse,’ never did I fathom I would lose the role over a 10 day overlap. I was happy with my contract with Summit and was fully prepared to continue to honor it. Summit chose simply to recast the part.”
This would support this writer's original theory, based on her comments on the set in May, that Lefevre wouldn't take any other role that would conflict with her finishing her character's trilogy in "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse". More as it develops.
Original Post Tues. July 28, 10:45 PM PST: In a major surprise to hardcore "Twilight" fans, the pivotal franchise role of Victoria has been recast.
The part had been portrayed by the relatively unknown Rachelle Lefevre in both "Twilight" and the upcoming "The Twilight Saga: New Moon." Tonight, however, Summit Entertainment announced Bryce Dallas Howard would take over the role in the upcoming third installment, "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse," which is scheduled to begin shooting at the end of the summer.
The villainous vampire first appeared in "Twilight" as a foil for the Cullens and Edward (Robert Pattinson) in particular. Victoria also appears in "New Moon," but is a central part of the conflict in "Eclipse" where she meets a grotesque end many fans can't wait to see on the big screen.
The studio explained the departure in a press releasing noting Lefevre "will not continue in the role due to scheduling conflicts with another commitment the actor has made." This is intriguing as the only picture Lefevre is publicly attached to is the indie "Barney's Shaft" with Dustin Hoffman and Paul Giamatti. It's hard to imagine any actress turning down the opportunity to finish out a role she appeared in two previous films unless the names Steve Spielberg, Peter Jackson, James Cameron or Clint Eastwood are involved. The news is even more peculiar considering how faithful Lefevre has been to the "Twilight" fanbase appearing at countless events on behalf of the franchise since the first film exploded at theaters last November. Just this past week Lefevre was on hand for some of the publicity events at San Diego Comic-Con. On the other hand, she did not appear on the Hall H panel with Pattinson, Kristen Stewart, Taylor Lautner, Ashley Greene and director Chris Weitz as she had the previous year.
HitFix spoke to Lefevre on the set of "New Moon" in Vancouver at the beginning of May and not returning seemed out of the question if she had a conflict. When asked about what she was doing in between the two films, Lefevre said, "I have a couple of things sort of in the mix right now that it looks like I’m going to get to do. One in between this and “Eclipse” but it’s a scheduling thing and so nothing is confirmed yet because you have to be available for the third movie."
As of 10:45 PM PST, Lefevre had not commented on her official twitter at twitter.com/RachelleLefevre. In fact, the normally busy tweeter hasn't commented once over the past three days.
The addition of Howard, however, only increases the stature of the franchise which brought on Michael Sheen and Dakota Fanning for "New Moon." Howard was most recently seen in "Terminator: Salvation," but is known for her roles in "The Lady in the Water" and "The Village."
Replacing actors in franchises is becoming a bit too common these days. Maggie Gyllenhaal stepped in for Katie Holmes in "The Dark Knight" and Don Cheadle did the same for Terrence Howard in the upcoming "Iron Man 2." Both those situations had little to do with "scheduling conflicts" and money or personality issues.
Look for more on this story as it develops on HitFix.
"The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" is already scheduled for release on June 30, 2010.
- Next Article in Movies
- Watch: Hugh Dancy and Rose Byrne find love in 'Adam'
- Previous Article in Movies
- Did Cameron Diaz give away the secret of 'The Box' at Comic-Con?














Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupcindywh You have got to be kidding. BDH is not right for this role. I don't believe there was any scheduling conflict sounds like Hollywood hijinks to me.
July 29, 2009 at 7:11AM EST Reply to CommentSisa No way. Scheduling problem? It's a joke, nobody believes that. Rachelle wasn't aware of this like 5 days ago and they already have a new actress for this role. This is SO NOT KOSHER.
July 29, 2009 at 8:35AM EST Reply to CommentMarcela everyone sign this petion to get rachelle back on eclipse
July 29, 2009 at 9:27AM EST Reply to Commenthttp://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/rachelleinecpliseyes/
Celebsession Blog Recasting Rachelle Lefevre is a HUGE mistake. It sure pays to be Ron Howard's daughter!
July 29, 2009 at 10:46AM EST Reply to Commenthttp://www.celebsession.com/2009/07/oh-my-hotdamn-twilight-series-producers.html
Nan That is soooo looooow. Lefevre is one of the best in Twilight. It is awful. :(
July 29, 2009 at 11:50AM EST Reply to CommentMirtha RAcheleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee is da best. DAllas Sucks. I hate her acting is so simple. Bring back RAchelle!!!!!!!!!11
July 29, 2009 at 1:31PM EST Reply to CommentCourtney FYI, Her last name is spelled Lefevere. Because she had so many fake Twitter accounts, she had to spell it wrong on Twitter. It is LEFEVERE though. Anyway, I'm totally sad that she is being replaced and can't believe it's because of "scheduling." Who passes up Eclipse?? This is the movie Victoria is in the most. Something is totally fishy!
July 29, 2009 at 2:26PM EST Reply to Commentgregel Actually, her IMDB and movie credits have it as Lefevre.
July 29, 2009 at 5:09PM ESThici summit HUGE FAIL! epic fail! seriously rachelle was the perfect one to play it and summit should already know tht she hes an awesoeme fanbase!
July 29, 2009 at 6:01PM EST Reply to CommentErica I have lost a great deal of respect for Summit Entertainment. Eclipse will not be the same without Rachelle. Although she doesn't have a huge part in Twilight or New Moon, she was still a strong character and asset to the cast. This change is a horrible one, and this new girl, Bryce (sp?) isn't going to be as respected as if it were still Rachelle. Rachelle was the first to bring Victoria to life on the movie screen, and she should stay to continue her role. Summit, you disapoint me along with many of fans.
July 29, 2009 at 6:50PM EST Reply to CommentSheena Let's petition this!!! Summit you are on my s*** list. Rachelle is a spectacular Victoria. Not having her in Eclipse is almost unfathomable. I would compare it to recasting Edward.
July 29, 2009 at 7:00PM EST Reply to CommentI think Summit is making a huge mistake. They went from a small production studio to a big player in the entertainment industry thanks to Twilight fans. This is no way to repay our loyalty to the franchise by being disloyal to one of their actors.
I think I speak for many when I say BOO SUMMIT!!!
Amanda I'm completely disappointed. Lefevre was perfectly cast in the first place, and they're just doing this to increase Eclipse's star power. I for one feel that I won't be seeing any of the films past New Moon; Victoria is central in Eclipse and they're ruining the continuity for no reason.
July 29, 2009 at 7:35PM EST Reply to Commentbronwynmaye I think Rachelle Lefevre was very, very entertaining as Victoria. I really wanted to see her get to develop in the third film.
July 29, 2009 at 9:25PM EST Reply to CommentContinuity is a huge thing for me as well.
Finally, according to Lefevre's official statement, the sole issue was that Summit couldn't accommodate a mere 10-day conflict. If Summit can't handle something small like that without just obliterating the trust of so many fans, they're just not ready for the big leagues.
Sarah I will not see it in any format if they replace Rachelle. These were amazing books and the movie should be done with respect and taste. The FANS want continuity so maybe they quit with their dip#$i^ ideas and actually do this film right before they drive away a large portion of their fanbase. I hope they don't think we are so mindless that will slap money down for anything with the Twilight name so they can make the movies as crappy and unbelieveable as they want?
August 21, 2009 at 2:12AM EST Reply to Comment